Home

Public engagement can be as difficult to describe as it is to do well.

July 31, 2008 7:12 PM | 1 Comment | No TrackBacks

This resource was shared with me by one of our COPUS participants who thought it may be of interest:

The new Public Engagement Primer from Public Agenda is a valuable resource for those trying to better understand what public engagement is all about, and for those trying to explain it.

In a few short pages, the Primer explains how public engagement helps create civic capacity for public problem solving, offers 10 core principles of effective public engagement and enlists a few examples of key practices and strategies. The Primer also describes the power of “Citizen Choicework,” a critical element in many deliberative processes.

Some other essentials covered in the Primer:

▪ Authentic public engagement vs. business as usual

▪ Capacity-building vs. event-oriented approaches to engagement

▪ Responding thoughtfully and conscientiously to the public’s involvement

▪ Building long-term capacity

▪ Strengths and weaknesses of various engagement approaches and strategies.

The PDF is available for free download at: http://publicagenda.org/pubengage/pdfs/publicengagementprimer.pdf

More information is available through Public Agenda’s Center for Advances in Public Engagement at: http://publicagenda.org/pubengage/pe_cape.cfm

Public Agenda’s Center for Advances in Public Engagement (CAPE) researches, develops and disseminates new insights and practices that contribute to the field of public engagement. CAPE is dedicated to creating new and better ways for citizens to confront pressing public problems through dialogue, deliberation and collaborative action.

Contact:

Alison Kadlec, CAPE Associate Director

Public Agenda 6 East 39th Street, New York, NY 10016 212.686.6610 xt. 40 akadlec@publicagenda.org

Sigma Xi and Science Cafes

July 3, 2008 6:21 AM | No Comments | No TrackBacks

I have had some wonderful synergies from my COPUS involvement.

The effort to spread the word is ongoing. It is only a matter of time before COPUS reaches “critical mass” or the “tipping point”.

As liaison to Sigma Xi’s Committee for the Public Understanding of Science I expect them to fully endorse COPUS, bringing Society-wide recognition to COPUS. Furthermore, given the influence of the Committee members among science communicators nationally, COPUS should see some excellent momentum build out of that.

For Sigma Xi in particular, COPUS’ support of science cafés provides powerful synergies. With science cafés we (COPUS and Sigma Xi) are already communicating effectively with the public about science. Through science cafés, COPUS and Sigma are taking science to the people.

In places where people are already comfortable, chatting about day-to-day concerns and issues, scientists are bringing their knowledge and expertise into the conversation. We’re connecting scientists with the lay public with unprecedented impact and reach. We know it works. Soaring attendance at science cafés testifies to their ability to engage the public. It really doesn’t get any better.

Buy in from organizations such as WGBH and now, in a collaborative effort with PRI and the BBC, is further evidence of science cafés’ effectiveness. A recent NSF proposal was approved for funding to host “virtual” science cafés online, based on the same principle as the live events.

At the recent hub meeting St Petersburg, COPUS reaffirmed its support for science cafés. By leveraging its connections with organizers of these events, COPUS can be part of the conversation too. COPUS’ hub structure can provide tangible follow-up to a science café event so that folks leave with resolve about how they can address science issues in their community.

This is just the beginning. In a November 2007 survey (in which 10 per cent of our members responded), Sigma Xi members reaffirmed their commitment to engaging the public in science, ranking it top out of all of the Society’s external outreach programs. Sigma Xi staff now have a responsibility to fulfill the members’ mandate. We need a cohesive national organization to help us do that. COPUS is the only such organization. We will be working closely with COPUS in the coming months and years to realize our common goal of increasing public engagement in, understanding of and, most importantly, support for, the great human endeavor we call “science.”

Sigma Xi recently released a press release about their participation in COPUS: http://sigmaxi.org/about/news/2008Science09.shtml

This blog posting was contributed by Roger Harris, Director, Emerging Technologies and Research Analysis at Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society rharris@sigmaxi.org

« June 2008 | Main Index | Archives | August 2008 »

Categories

  • COPUS updates (6)
  • Great public programs, activities, and events (5)
  • On the public and science (13)
  • Regional Hubs (6)

Monthly Archives

  • March 2010 (2)
  • February 2010 (2)
  • January 2010 (1)
  • December 2009 (4)
  • November 2009 (1)
  • October 2009 (2)
  • September 2009 (3)
  • August 2009 (1)
  • June 2009 (1)
  • March 2009 (5)
  • January 2009 (8)
  • December 2008 (6)
  • October 2008 (1)
  • August 2008 (1)
  • July 2008 (2)
  • June 2008 (4)
  • May 2008 (1)
  • April 2008 (7)
  • March 2008 (8)
  • January 2008 (1)
  • December 2007 (1)
  • November 2007 (2)
  • October 2007 (1)
  • August 2007 (3)
  • June 2007 (1)
  • February 2007 (1)
  • January 2007 (1)
  • September 2006 (1)
  • August 2006 (2)

Pages

  • Subscribe to feed Subscribe to this blog's feed
Powered by Movable Type 4.34-en

Search

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from July 2008 listed from newest to oldest.

June 2008 is the previous archive.

August 2008 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

National Science Foundation The cognizant fiduciary body for the COPUS and Year of Science 2009 projects is the American Institute of Biological Sciences Inc., a nonprofit 501(c)(3) scientific association founded in 1947 as a part of the National Academy of Sciences, and an independent, member-governed organization since the 1950s. Support for COPUS workshops by the National Science Foundation under Grant Nos. EAR-0606600, EAR-0628790, and EAR-0814048. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in the material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.



© COPUS 2010