COPUS Blog Home

How to Advance Scientific Literacy

September 3, 2009 8:44 AM | No Comments | No TrackBacks

Media Contact:

ajb@botany.org            

For Immediate Release 

Three upcoming articles look into the ways plant biologists can improve science communication with students and the general public

Society needs science, and scientists need an informed, thoughtful, and open-minded citizenry. Thus, the obvious dependence of American society on science is strikingly inconsistent with the low level of scientific literacy among U. S. citizens. By establishing 2009 as the "Year of Science," professional scientific organizations and grassroots, citizens-for-science groups hope to bring a renewed and invigorated focus on the importance of science now and in the future. As knowledge experts and educators, practicing scientists are key players in advancing the scientific literacy agenda.

As part of its 2008 annual meeting, the Botanical Society of America (BSA) organized a symposium to help inform attendees about the issues involved in scientific literacy as well as the progress achieved toward the goal of obtaining a public that is better informed and more accepting of scientific achievements and science in general. There were five presentations during the symposium: Marshall Sundberg discussed the PlantingScience initiative developed by the BSA (www.PlantingScience.org), Gordon Uno showed how developing botanical literacy among our students can contribute to scientific literacy, Judith Scotchmoor illustrated how she and her colleagues have developed educational outreach and resources for helping teachers teach the process of science to their students, and Matthew Nisbet and Dietram Scheufele each discussed different aspects of science communication and the public.

Papers based on these presentations will be published in the October issue of the American Journal of Botany and will remain free for viewing. All of the papers--including the introduction by Christopher Haufler and Marshall Sundberg (http://www.amjbot.org/cgi/reprint/ajb.0900241v1)--show how both passive and active forces have contributed to current concerns about scientific literacy.

In his contribution, Gordon Uno (http://www.amjbot.org/cgi/reprint/ajb.0900025v1) summarizes why it is important for scientists in general and botanists in particular to invigorate science teaching with inquiry methods. He illustrates the challenges we face because students lack critical thinking skills, are generally uninformed about plants, and many are actually hostile toward learning about plant biology. To improve this situation, Uno provides seven principles of learning that make recommendations about how botanists should teach, including using themes and "thinking botanically" to illustrate all biological concepts.

Judith Scotchmoor and her colleagues Anastasia Thanukos and Sheri Potter (http://www.amjbot.org/cgi/reprint/ajb.0900014v1) discuss efforts targeted at raising public awareness of science (via COPUS, the Coalition on the Public Understanding of Science) and provide resources that are available to teachers who seek to weave the "process of science" into courses to inform students about how science works. By developing a public that is more actively aware of science as part of their lives, both citizens in general and students in particular are more likely to be interested in learning about science. Scotchmoor et al. also discuss the web-based project called "Understanding Science" that aims to improve teacher understanding of the nature of the scientific enterprise, provide resources that encourage and enable K-16 teachers to reinforce the nature of science throughout their teaching, and serve as a clear and accessible reference that accurately portrays the scientific endeavor.

Matthew Nisbet and Dietram Scheufele (http://www.amjbot.org/cgi/reprint/ajb.0900041v1) melded their presentations into a joint-authored paper to discuss efforts targeted at raising public awareness of science. As researchers into communication about science, these authors illustrate that building a public that is more receptive to science requires more than enhancing scientific literacy. They emphasize that science communication efforts need to be based on a systematic, empirical understanding of the intended audience's existing values, knowledge, and attitudes, their interpersonal and social contexts, and their preferred media sources and communication channels.

Taken together, this set of papers captures current issues about the public understanding of science, illustrates why greater emphasis on helping students understand and appreciate the process of science is so important, and provides insights and perspectives on what all practicing scientists can do to build a more receptive audience. It appears that in some respects academic scientists are contributing to the problem because we tend to teach content (facts about biology) rather than process (how to learn about biology). We need to help our students understand how scientists actually do our work, and we should learn about the social dynamics involved with scientific communication. Each of the papers presents different elements of making us more aware of the challenges we face, better prepared to help our students appreciate and learn about science, and in general enhancing our capacity to change the future. Practicing scientists should be active participants in making sure that scientific literacy improves for new generations of students.

###

The full articles in the links mentioned are available for no charge for 30 days following the date of this summary at http://www.amjbot.org/papbyrecent.dtl. After this date, reporters may contact Richard Hund at ajb@botany.org for a copy of the article.

The Botanical Society of America (www.botany.org) is a non-profit membership society with a mission to promote botany, the field of basic science dealing with the study and inquiry into the form, function, development, diversity, reproduction, evolution, and uses of plants and their interactions within the biosphere. It has published the American Journal of Botany (www.amjbot.org) for nearly 100 years. In 2009, the Special Libraries Association named the American Journal of Botany one of the Top 10 Most Influential Journals of the Century in the field of Biology and Medicine.

For further information, please contact the AJB staff at ajb@botany.org.

Categories:

  • On the public and science

Tags:

  • American Journal of Botany,
  • Botanical Society of America,
  • Understanding Science
< Previous Next >

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://publish.aibs.org/mt-tb.cgi/5633

Leave a comment

Search

Monthly Archives

  • August 2010 (1)
  • June 2010 (2)
  • May 2010 (5)
  • April 2010 (2)
  • March 2010 (2)
  • February 2010 (2)
  • January 2010 (1)
  • December 2009 (4)
  • November 2009 (1)
  • October 2009 (2)
  • September 2009 (3)
  • August 2009 (1)
  • June 2009 (1)
  • March 2009 (5)
  • January 2009 (8)
  • December 2008 (6)
  • October 2008 (1)
  • August 2008 (1)
  • July 2008 (2)
  • June 2008 (4)
  • May 2008 (1)
  • April 2008 (7)
  • March 2008 (8)
  • January 2008 (1)
  • December 2007 (1)
  • November 2007 (2)
  • October 2007 (1)
  • August 2007 (3)
  • June 2007 (1)
  • February 2007 (1)
  • January 2007 (1)
  • September 2006 (1)
  • August 2006 (2)

Pages

  • Subscribe to feed Subscribe to this blog's feed
Powered by Movable Type 4.34-en

Categories

  • COPUS updates (22)
  • Great public programs, activities, and events (26)
  • On the public and science (34)
  • Regional Hubs (12)

About this Entry

user-pic
by Sheri Potter published on September 3, 2009 8:44 AM.

The Year of Science Zine-a-thon Contest was the previous entry in this blog.

Letter in the Mail?! is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Authors

  • Bernadette Farrelly (1)
  • Diane Bosnjak (3)
  • Diane Bosnjak (4)
  • Danielle Lee (4)
  • Jennifer Skene (7)
  • Sonia Bhangoo (2)
  • Sheri Potter (63)

Tag Cloud

  • AAAS
  • Carl Zimmer
  • Chris Mooney
  • communicating science
  • COPUS
  • culture
  • Facebook
  • Flat Stanley
  • Florida
  • health
  • radio
  • regional hubs
  • science
  • Science Cafes
  • Science Generation
  • Science Zine-a-thon Contest
  • Student Pugwash USA
  • tv
  • Understanding Science
  • Year of Science 2009
National Science Foundation The cognizant fiduciary body for the COPUS and Year of Science 2009 projects is the American Institute of Biological Sciences Inc., a nonprofit 501(c)(3) scientific association founded in 1947 as a part of the National Academy of Sciences, and an independent, member-governed organization since the 1950s. Support for COPUS workshops by the National Science Foundation under Grant Nos. EAR-0606600, EAR-0628790, and EAR-0814048. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in the material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.



© COPUS 2010