September 2008 Archives

AIBS Public Policy Office Training Initiatives

"The public thinks science is good and we need lots of it" -- I don't disagree with Dan Greenberg on this point.

"The scientific community’s government wish list is small and tidy: Send more money, minimize regulations affecting research, and show us respect" -- nor do I disagree with the core arguments of this, his somewhat puckish point.

But there's many a slip twixt cup and lip as one goes from generalities to specifics. Scientists need to keep in mind that while broad public support for science is necessary for the success of the scientific enterprise, it rests on what the general public and their elected representatives at federal, state, and local levels think science is and is not. Constant explanation and reminding are necessary lest things drift off-course. The merits of scientific arguments do not speak for themselves. As one extreme example of how off-course things can get, this fall we have the alarming situation of Gov. Sarah Palin, a candidate for Vice-President of the U.S., being a proponent of young earth creationism, which holds that the earth is less than 7,000 years old and that humans once walked with dinosaurs.

Success also rests on recognizing that the public funding legislators approve does not go toward an amorphous activity simply called "science"; rather, it is allocated among specific disciplinary areas of science, specific programs, and specific funding agencies -- each of which must be its own best advocate to receive support. If biologists and biological organizations are going to be heard in this crowded and cacophonous arena where interests jostle for public attention, policy impact, and funding support, we need to have a clear message, sharp elbows, and the smarts to stick together while pursuing alliances with other scientists.

One great way for biologists to work together is through the AIBS Public Policy Office's training programs. Staffed by professionals with years of experience working with scientists, law-makers, and opinion shapers, the AIBS Public Policy Office provides public presentations and small-group training programs that help scientists and educators become effective advocates for science.

A one-hour talk exploring a current science policy issue is usually available on relatively short notice. Themes for these talks include such issues as the politics and policy of evolution education, federal funding trends for scientific research and development, or an overview of on-going science policy issues. These one-hour presentations provide the basic information required to understand the debate surrounding an issue, along with practical steps on how to engage in the public policy discourse.

The AIBS Public Policy Office also offers two-hour and longer interactive workshops for AIBS member organizations, academic departments, or similar organizations. These workshops afford participants the opportunity to interact with the instructor and others in the course. Participants learn basic skills and knowledge that will help them work productively with policymakers, administrators, news reporters, or the public. Depending upon the interests and composition of the sponsoring organization, these workshops can be designed to include a mix of advocacy and media training. Participants receive a tool-kit of quick reference materials (e.g. a Congressional Directory, and the AIBS publication, Communicating Science: A Primer for Working with the Media).

[Update: see William J. Broad's article on this today in the New York Times]

Senator Obama replied to ScienceDebate2008's "14 top science questions facing America" last August. Senator McCain has now also replied. A side-by-side listing of the two presidential candidates' answers to each of the questions can be found here.

The questions were developed from over 3,400 submissions from the more than 38,500 signers of the ScienceDebate2008 initiative, including scientists, engineers, and other concerned Americans, as well as nearly every major American science organization, dozens of Nobel laureates, elected officials and business leaders, and the presidents of over 100 major American universities.

The 14 questions address energy policy, national security, economics in a science-driven global economy, climate change, education, health care, ocean health, biosecurity, clean water, space, stem cells, scientific integrity, genetics, and research.

Efforts to engage the candidates and their representatives in public discussions of science issues continue -- see, for example, the upcoming candidates' forum on 18 September organized by the Scientists and Engineers for America.

For more information on the ScienceDebate2008 initiative, to see a list of the signers, and to see detailed results of national polls, see www.sciencedebate2008.com.


Here's an excellent opportunity to publicly question the Obama-Biden and McCain-Palin tickets about their views on some of the scientific aspects of broader public policy issues...

As noted in the most recent AIBS Public Policy Report, AIBS has joined with Scientists and Engineers for America, the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB), IEEE-USA, Research!America, and The George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services to cosponsor two debates between senior representatives of the Obama and McCain presidential campaigns.

The first debate, themed "Presidential Perspectives on Health," will be held at George Washington University in Washington, DC, on 18 September 2008, 5:00 - 6:30 p.m. Moderated by Julie Rovner, health policy consultant for National Public Radio, the debate will feature Jay Koshla, health policy advisor to John McCain and Dora Hughes, MD, MPH, health advisor to Barack Obama. Campaign representatives will accept questions from the audience. Individuals unable to attend the debate in person can view it via a web feed at http://sharp.sefora.org/candidate-forum/; questions can be sent in advance to Questions@SEforA.org.

If you're planning to attend in person, RSVP by 16 September to rsvp@SEforA.org or 202.223.6444 then go to:

Jack Morton Auditorium
Media & Public Affairs Building
The George Washington University
805 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC

A second debate on energy policy will be held in the coming weeks, likely at a university in California.

For further details about these debates and other information about the candidates' positions on science, visit http://sharp.sefora.org/.